The Celebrity X-Ray Thread

she has some potential :la:

 

I'm more than doubtful on almost all he's been posting - this is why beginners should not use the burn & dodge tools, as it makes stuff seem to appear when there's nothing there. All I see is stray artifacts which are then burned into appearing like nipples & areolas. The top is not transparent, nor thin enough to transmit details to the surface to x-ray. Please don't keep passing off these images as X-rays as there is too much creative license being applied here. Perhaps better posted in the fakeray thread.

This is not about "guessing". If it's there, there's no reason to have to "guess" as that's making it up, and faking it.

 

Kim is the Queen of the world no doubt about that.

 

Meanwhile, I'm sorry to point out that I am not a beginner but I work with graphics programs and so far no one has ever complained ........
definitely do not want to debate, but when I said I guess, it was understood that if the fabric allows to see the profile of what's underneath this allows me to recreate in a realistic way, not inventing what's underneath, with the only drawback of not being able to know which color is really ....... but this happens with any xray.
I also want to reiterate that the warning is very important because I can easy from my admonition to see only changing the overall contrast in the original photos emma profile of the nipples and areolas ........ then I add the color it seems obvious ...... but if necessary I can show without a doubt the profile in BW ........
as I said I do not like fakeray and I do not dare to post the xray if they were not based on something verametne observable from the original photo.
This is not to raise a controversy it is clear it was just to clarify. I submit that if rischiesto not post most of my work will be appreciated that in other places!
regards

 

Beyonce selfie

 

Hayden Panettiere unknow event

 

Love when a chick (Like Beyonce) knows she it hot.

 

Emma Watson's top is simply too thick; there are contours that give the illusion that 'something can be brought to light' but it is still an illusion.



Emma's definitive see-through outfit is in 2010, Women's Wear Daily shoot ... http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=675944&p=5456391&viewfull=1#post5456391

If you apply your graphics skills to these pics, you'll notice that her areola is actually much larger. That said, you have skills and I would encourage you to keep at it. Aside from c-through's seminal work ... http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=168882&highlight=x-ray

... here are some 'reference material' you may want to review from this huge thread ...

Edalmudena Fernandez by msnevil ... http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=92874&p=886760&viewfull=1#post886760
Natalie Portman by opo ... http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=92874&p=859707&viewfull=1#post859707
Jorja Fox by bigreaper ... http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=92874&p=914636&viewfull=1#post914636
Estella Warren by x-caliber0069 ... http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=92874&p=2672512&viewfull=1#post2672512
Nikki Read by xraymachine ... http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=92874&p=850091&viewfull=1#post850091
Anna Paquin by Sentinel67 ... http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=92874&p=1517655&viewfull=1#post1517655

 

same steps as the other

 

'Nashville' photocall Los Angeles - 15 September 2014

 

Lol

 

Ok I seem to have figured out that the amateur is not me .......
What is the worst method proposed eg pull off something without burning details etc etc .....
I use a different procedure .
Now I show you what I can see with my procedure at the beginning of work .....





You can clearly see the outline of the areola , or nipple may cover sticker ....
Obviously I do not want to teach anything to someone better than me , but as I said I do not work I do not see anything real ! If you think that what I have shown is not real, then we have two different views of reality !
No hard feelings , I greet you

 

She clearly wants to mess with me ....... I'm not offended because I can also offer a work that others can not do ......
This is a job well done !!!
Greetings and good continuation

 

Put your thing where it belongs, FakeRay Thread..

 

Yeah I have no clue wtf is fake or real. Whos posting real xrays and not adding things to them here? Names im referring to.

 

Ok guys , I await advice from a moderator on my work up to that time did not dare to be insulted or mocked for my work , as I said I do not fakeray , work only on the image where you can see something, if someone does not is able to use my same technique is not my fault ..... I also posted photos showing that where someone said that you could not see anything, instead you see something .......
regards

 

THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION THREAD..!! at least not to my knowledge.... but it's getting that way...??

less arguing and waffle would be greatly appreciated folks.... tyvm.

 

Sorry but no, you can't. After having already tried as soon as the pics were posted and being somewhat disappointed after expecting to be, and having seen how thick that material is in close ups there is absolutely nothing to be seen. Nada. Nothing. And from that picture it's more than obvious it's sadly just your mind wanting to see something based on the texture and folds in the fabric. Sorry bruh.

 

I believe that many people have problems with their monitors ...... or follow the forum by phone .......
I have nothing to say in the photo I posted as an example is a visible circle of the areola !
if you are not able to see the problem you are looking for is not from me .......

Ps .
Have you calibrated your monitor , if you know what I mean?

 

Let me put it this way, I can use the burn tool to put nipples on her thighs... so burn tool = fake. I can't however x-ray her thighs to see a nipple. The thing you see in the photo can be from the fabric folding at the end of the seam like that, or it could be from her nipple next to the seam, either way it doesn't matter, the material is to thick at that point in the fabric to x-ray unless we could get a photo taken with the uv filter taken out of the camera... Nikki was faked, or xray is just that pro, but adjusting the brightness/contrast/shadows/highlights did nothing for me... but I'm nooooob... so in essence, stop using the burn tool, even I can put nipples on their knees...