The Celebrity X-Ray Thread

See, that's the part I'm not sure of. When I tried it months ago, I thought I was getting the outline of an areola, I just didn't have high enough confidence in it to post it. Perhaps it was blurred some in the original so it wouldn't stick out. That's why I thought a better x-ray artist might do better.

The pic looks great though, and for viewing pleasure is perhaps as good as the "real" thing. Kind of raises the question where does reality fade into fantasy.

 

To me, it looks like some one used a clone stamp tool and healing brush, to obliterate her real nipples. Every version of this pic I've ever seen is the same. No nipple showing. That leads me to the conclusion the original release was already "airbrushed". I'd love to find an unaltered original, but SMG prolly had them destroyed. BTW, the original you posted is the same as the one I have.

 

Ya know, maybe it was airbrushed some but there is still some detail left underneath. I don't know how to import nipples (or anything else, for that matter) into a photo and yet I thought I was getting something. The right areola on my working copy came out fairly well (at least I'd say), it was the other side where I wasn't getting a "realistic" looking result. That's why I'd like to see some others take a shot from that original to see if they come up with anything. Unfortunately, when I worked on those, I didn't make "sequential" copies to show the progress. I'd have to start from scratch and I'm not sure I want to tackle that right now. Anyways, some Phun in this thread today.

 

Well, back to some x-rays. This was one I was somewhat hesitant to post. Since it is "x-raying" a sweater, it seems you can only get so much transparency and detail to come through. But it has an interesting, almost artistic look to it and she has a bunch of fans on this Forum (and, for good reason). So, what the heck. I guess it's from her official calendar a couple years ago???

 

i approve all Tweedy see-thrus pics

 

Yup ... too good to be true. original is already airbrushed. There is some detail there but not enough. Moreover, her right nip (see 3rd pic, smg_hsb_s) is in the wrong place compared to the unmodified original.

Supernova - Looks like you got 'punked' (as in TV show). On the upside, don't get discouraged and use the same skills you applied to future pics.

 

You should always be skeptical on a single image that seems too good to be true. SMG has very few good x-rayable pics, especially from photoshoots. I always try to find other images from the series or other versions of the image in question to try and confirm it's validity.

Don't feel too bad - you're not the first one to be taken in by a good fake. This is one of the reasons the fake artists used to brand their work so it wasn't mistaken for the real thing, or others to take credit for their work.

 

i was punked big time! Damn!

 

Yep... phunny how things work... Gave me a good laugh once I got passed the embarrassment.

 

It's all for Phun. No need be embarrassed. The techniques you were using were the right ones, so keep up the good werk.

 

Jennifer Lawrence

Someone posted a decent vag xray from this set a little while ago, which I honestly thought was fake at the time. At least until I found this:

I can already see her groin, if just barely. If someone did their magic on this, a lot of people (including me) would be eternally grateful. Thanks!

 

I gave a shot at the original SMG and got nothing out of it. So the doctored image must have been a fakeray.

Oh well.... it was too good to be true. Thanks for the compliments about my work, however.

 

what is SMG?

What is the expansion of smg?

 

Sarah Michelle Gellar.... scroll back through the discussion...

 

waiting this .

 

cf1 - perhaps if you could find a more original HQ pic of Jennifer Lawrence - that one is highly compressed which adds a lot of .jpg pixelation noise, not to mention the bottom section is covered up with the tag bar.

numberone_01 - There's really nothing more to get that's why nobody posted anything on that Scarlett upskirt. You can see she's got black panties under the tights, but that's about it. When you don't see any posts for a request, it basically means there's nothing to get or nobody's interested. In SJ's case, there is plenty of interest, but no detail to reveal. No need to bump requests.

 

So, curiosity got the better of me and I recreated my earlier attempts to x-ray the photo. These "progress" pics show the progress toward a transparent x-ray. In the third, if you look closely, there appears to be the outline of SMG's areolas - more on her right breast, than the left. It's what I was attempting to "bring out" when I worked on this photo a few months back. Giving this a second thought, however, if the photo was that "transparent" to begin with, once I hit the stage of photo three, the areola and nipple should've been clear as day. I didn't think about that at the time and was operating under the general tack like I showed in the Heather Locklear pics a few weeks back. Usually, the areola shows up largely as an outline. So, when I saw the outline, I figured that was normal. It didn't occur to me that the pic had been doctored to squelch original detail. I guess that explains why, when I tried to enhance the detail, I wasn't too confident of the result, which wasn't all that natural looking. Guess I was fooled, to some extent, myself.

 

I don't usually x-ray photos of celebs that have appeared nude before, but this photo of a young Diane Lane is rather alluring and playful. Couldn't resist.

 

dude how do you did that? you send here steps??

 

Katy Perry?