Miley Cyrus - Brian Bowen Smith 2013 photoshoot lq (adds)

Sorry to say this, but I really wouldn't mind if you would get banned for few days for your immature spam

 

Nice Thread btw

 

Now this is a REAL thread

http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=1111430

But I'm sure one of you that have kept this thread alive will argue the photos are fake.

 

now those are amazing:2cent::nutkick:

 

Now you guys are just bumping this thread for no reason mostly. Moved to CX.

 

LAST WORD!

 

First post. Hmm, I probably wasted that, didn't I?

 

what's funny?

It looks very real because it has the same jacket and jewelry.The question really is if the tits where shopped in,which I doubt they were since nobody can find the source.

 

I don't really think 10 year old boys have tits, curves and ass like Miley's - just saying.
(I was one once)

(PS I thought it would get moved to CX when it was less pics and more discussion)

 

Here is all the photos in the thread put together

Evidence points to REAL:yes_new:

 

I'm assuming by original photo, you mean the one you linked? Which, by no definition of "original" is correct, but here you go.

You get texture mapping on every part of the image except the gigantic fake breasts.


From this angle, you can see the void where those massive knockers should be creating some pretty hefty textures.

 

afew to compare with, ithink its real(not from comparison)

 

A tad off-topic, I'm curious on how you do the texture mapping? Is there a tutorial somewhere?

 

Well, I beg to differ. We're turning out some real big fat fatties here in America nowadays... I bet without much effort, one could produce evidence of MANY 10 year old boys with tits. Just saying...

 

http://www.nudography.com/News.aspx?IDNews=6229

 

I was thinking of Australia, but I spose it's all about where you live.

We don't have a child obesity problem yet. (yet)

Even still, Miley compared to a small round fat kid - ummmm noooo.

 

LOL so I guess her Jeans and the wall behind her are "fake" too?
...since they don't have any cool spikey things in them! lol

Texture mapping is a graphic "effect" found in graphics editing programs.
Its used to ADD textures and create interesting effects.
Its not an "FBI tool for discovering photographic manipulations".
hahahahaha

I don't want to start an argument here...lets just agree to disagree
on this one?
I get a kick out of the lack of evidence for or against the photo in question
...and the ridiculous "proof" being presented .
...including "texture mapping" the photo, which I think is a silly idea.

By the way...I made the big knockers photo...just in case you actually thought
I was presenting it as "the original". It was posted earlier in this thread.

And no...her boobs in the "topless" photo
don't match her boobs in any previous "clothed" photo.
(IN MY OPINION)
...but 14 pages of discussion over this issue is an absolute HOOT!!

 

Hello,

I have just discovered the internet. And so, I've decided to keep this thread alive.