'Michael Jackson stockpiled child porn, animal abuse videos'

SANTA BARBARA: A never seen police report from 2003 raids on pop legend Michael Jackson’s home sheds light on a huge collection of sickening material depicting child sexual abuse and animal torture.

The discovery surfaced when 70 members of the Santa Barbara County District Attorney’s Office and Sheriff ’s department raided the star’s Neverland Ranch in November 2003, following accusations from molested young boys.

According to Radar Online, although the singer was found not guilty during his trial in 2005 for child molestation charges, the detail o f the twisted collection was never revealed until now. The report says that the singer’s house was littered with nude photos of teenage boys from the late 1800s.

Santa Barbara Senior Assistant District Attorney Ron Zonen who was on the case told Radar Online, that Jackson was a “drug and sex crazed predator who used blood, gore, sexually explicit images animal sacrifice and perverse adult sex acts to bend children to his will. He also had disgusting and downright shocking images of child torture, adult and child nudity, female bondage and sadomasochism.”

The report claimed that Jackson possessed the videos to desensitize children. It even stated that the king of pop used “sexy” photos of his own nephews, to “excite” the young boys who he later admitted taking into his bed. The sickening stockpile also included a picture of a child holding a goose that had been beaten to death and scores of sadomasochistic images. The legendary pop singer is believed to have spent US $200 million on hush money to as many as 20 children, before his death in 2009.

Update: In a statement to Vanity Fair, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department said of the documents:

 

I don't think anyone is surprised by this at all. I'm not anyway.

 

The more I read that post the more ridiculous it got.

 

My opinion is that he was just another fucktard freak that got away with his bullshit because of his bank account and celebrity. No matter now though. Good riddance.

 

Shame the OP couldn't be arsed to spell Michael Jackson correctly; but same as above, not at all shocked by this news.....

 

Weird? Yes. But good riddance?

 

lies................

 

You may have answered your own question Mr.TMZ.

 

Probably for the best that he is dead. There are kids around at the moment who have not been molested who would have been had Jackson lived.

 

you know for a fact he did it?

 

if this was true they would have charged him with possession of child pornography

sounds made up. how could they know this?

 

Psychologists have studied human behavior enough to have a pretty good idea between linking certain personalities and behavior.

 

FINALLY, someone said the obvious!

And that MJ had a regular porn stash isn't news, the list of DVDs in his belonging were revealed in the court case where he was found innocent.
Why would it be so shocking that MJ wanted to rub one out every now and then?
It's like when people were shocked that MJ and Lisa Marie Presley were fucking; like why would that be weird just because MJ also were into super soakers and shit people give up liking when they get old and start to hate themselves?

Tomorrow is the anniversary of his death and every single fucking year around this time there's someone who wants to dig up old shit or make up stories.
Just let the man rest at least until someone shows video footage of MJ assfucking one of them bitch ass kids or anything remotely heavy enough to be evidence that he did.

"You don't have to read it
And you don't have to eat it
To buy it is to feed it
So why do we keep foolin' ourselves

Just because you read it in a magazine
Or see it on the TV screen
Don't make it factual"

[video=youtube;V8kUYr2ZC6U]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8kUYr2ZC6U[/video]

 

A child knew exactly what his penis looked like.

Now you can arrive to what ever conclusions that you will from that, but to reiterate Michael Jackson had distinguishing marks on his penis that a child identified. Let's pretend that other giant pile of evidence doesn't exist, let's forget about his hoard of batshit crazy material, let's forget about the settlements, the accusations, the sleeping with children... just try to figure out how to explain how a child got that good a look.

 

That was pretty much my reaction as well.

 

Your 1st 10 posts, if they have links in them, need to be approved by a Moderator. Sometimes we miss those posts and so they get forgotten, also the site has been buggy over the past few months and sometimes the posts didn't show up even after we approved them. Anyway, you're past 10 posts now so you shouldn't have a problem.

 

the title under your name fits.......again you don't know any of this for a fact.....and you obviously never followed the cases....

 

Your standard of proof rises to the level of absurdity. I know all celebrities will have their apologists, they can rape anyone, they can do anything, and someone out there will always defend them. I think that speaks to a terrible aspect of human nature.

I don't know how well acquainted you were with the time they took pictures of Michael Jackson's penis, but they did it for a very specific reason. A child alleged distinguishing marks on his penis. Now, someone involved in the case is on record as verifying that the child was accurate in that identification. Might that have been a total fabrication? Yes, it could be, but it's an odd thing to make up and document is it not? It also isn't the type of thing you'd go on the record with (without being sued to hell and back) unless you can back it up. Otherwise that's defamation of character.

Now, I can not speak to every allegation made and of course in the Michaela Jackson is a disgusting piece of crap pile, are some things that were no doubt fabricated. Along with that there are various things that are hard to prove, such as exactly how many payoffs he gave, to how many people, to make cases like the one I alluded to earlier go away. However, even the most obtuse individual has to, at some point acknowledge the mountain of evidence for what it is.

A normal man doesn't name his kid Blanket. A normal grown man doesn't usually sleep with children. A normal man doesn't have so many surgeries on his nose that he looks like the crypt keeper. A normal man doesn't show pornography to children. A normal man doesn't keep a collection of deviant material including abused animals and children. These are all indications of a very troubled individual and the fact that people defend this behavior is saddening and exactly why he was not held account for his behavior.

The guy drugged himself to death, if people had prevented his actions instead of defending them, not only might children have been spared molestation, but Michael Jackson might be alive today. There's a sort of ironic justice in the fact that the same people who would let him get away with anything let him get away with slowly killing himself because everything he did was above being questioned.

 

:wtf1:

 

nice rant that shows a strong dislike for him that muddies your judgement hence you have to insult me and mj......you want to lecture based on already disproven allegations brought up by two rag newspapers that only bring it up because it's the anniversary of his death.