Ask A Mod: All Questions Answered (whether you like it or not) [NS]

We get lots of questions and each of us have a different take on them. Ask your questions here about forum issues or our take on the rules, or whatever you have in mind.

This is the place to clear the air, gain understanding or make certain we are all on the same page.

Serious inquiries Only.

What say you?

 

I just want to clarify that i will not discuss any bans or time offs given unless i consider it to be something the Community as a whole benefits from knowing the background behind.

 

Great thread idea.

Maybe you should have called this thread "what pisses you off ', because mine is more a whinge/pissed off, than a question.

1. What pisses me off is thread titles in sexy/HD video sections. Some don't make any sense whatsover. I say to myself WTF? I don't report them as there is no rule for thread titles that don't make sense! Seriously, you should read some of them????

2. Another thing is the using of words such as "whore" & "slut" in thread titles.
Can we PLEASE add a rule to stop this. :zx11pissed:

Edit: Here's a thread title in HD; "Heyzo Sato Yuri - to volley after another medium to raw rice cake skin erotic "???????

Looks like english, however I need a decoder to decipher it?

 

The terms "whore" and "slut" are acceptable in regards to porn vids; even the most highly respectable studios use those terms in their "official" titles. It's porn, get over it.

As far as the titles that don't make any sense: who cares? Are you going to stare at the title 24/7? Look at the vidcaps. If you like what you see then download the vid and

Otherwise, move on.

Sato Yuri is the name of the performer. What more do you need to know? She's getting fucked? Guess what, yeah.

 

Thanks, I gathered that was her name, however, but what does this mean? to volley after another medium to raw rice cake skin erotic

..... and BTW, I know what a 'rice cake" is!

 

I don't know either.

It could be the mangled translation of the original title. In theory we frown upon messed up titles like that, but if a post meets all the other criterion we generally give them a pass. Or at least I do. Proper thread titles in SVF are actually a bone of contention among some of the staff. cayne has a laissez faire policy regarding titles: if a studio can't find their content here then they can't complain about it. Works for me.

 

[video]http://*************/movies/2610943/hot_milf.html[/video]

what you see above is a flv video from xhamster
not a very good one
but one none the less

why is xhamster banned here
why is any flash site banned here
why cant we post flash files and embed sex videos like we can youtubes
why is it, cause i dont want to download porn, i just want to click and play
and its not like xhamster or pornhub is paying for this shit, its all pirated just like the other vids here
and it not like it on phuns server, as its still running on xhamsters server, and embedded in our thread
the only difference is that i dont have to bother downloaded and all the other bullshit that goes with it

lets move forward, get rid of the ****** and see if we can get some action in this dump

thoughts

 

Because we don't want to.

 

why? why ban only sex flv vids

 

If we allowed embedded porn we would have review every video for it's content. Who has time for that? Do you?

 

you dont have to review an embed video
the same reason you dont have to with youtubes

becouse the kind folks at xhamster do it for you
its on their servers. so they are responsible for the material
your job is done for you

you could say, ok these sites can be embeded from
these cant becouse their sites are known to be to liberal on content

one broad discussion
i remember now i tried this years ago, i had just forgotten that i did
back then i just simply put the links
and the thread was deleted

also, what would be the difference between me posting a video that is unacceptable and posting a file contianing a video that is unacceptable
do the mods down load and review the files offered here.
i cannot tell you now many times i downloaded a video that did not contain the video the was previewed

it is the sole reason i simply stopped downloading

but with an flv, the screen shot you get is the screen shot of at least some part of the film
that does not always happen with a download

besides, i have far less time to bother with downloading something like time is not worth anything.
and im betting as consumer, i do not stand alone
it would open you up to an entirely new customer. more clicks
more advertising
more cash for cayne
and that something. not something i care about, but something,.

 

i beg that you not just shoot this idea down
offer it for a open discussion
weigh the pros and cons,
understanding the real benefits and the real distractions
and consider the potential.
its something i have not seen on very many forums, and i cant think of one that i could reference you to.

and it may be a really good addition to this one

i can already embed the video, just remove the restriction from like one site, open one thread and see if it flies
my guess will be i might just possibly be, a good thing.

 

i might even contribute
i dont have to wait to up load
i dont have to make a preview
i dont have to create a post

all i have to do is hit
share
copy
past
post

could it be just that easy
you bet it is
and bam, instant content
the same content pornhub has

 

Adding embedded porn is likely something cayne has already considered and rejected. Maybe River will add some insight here.

 

OK. my point is here for review
I thinks the times they are a changin
change or be left is my motto

 

Yours is the first inquiry I can recall about streaming video. This suggests that the demand is not there from our members, or that they have different expectations of forums than they do of sites like xhampster or motherless, etc.

 

your doing pretty good at the reasons why not

do you know any other forums that stream video?

so there expectations have never been inspired
without trying we shall never know

 

while your thinking it over
you can watch this embeded video of a hot chick telling a joke
not a hot chick having sex. odd really
there is this imaginary line

[video=youtube;GHYPheVohsE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHYPheVohsE#t=52[/video]

 

That's because I can't think of any good reasons why that would clearly outweigh the why not.

 

Perhaps start a thread on this in The Lounge, that way other members can give their input/opinion.