The Celebrity X-Ray Thread

Brick wall, banging and head are all contained in any reply here. And names too!

 

Thought I'd try some Lucy Pinder.

 

Dakota Fanning

 

PINDER has to be the most under x-rayed , underfaked woman on teh internets

 

Agreed man, I only had a quick look on her main site and that was the best x-rayable stuff I could find, bearing in mind I didn't check the 'Nuts' section yet.

 

anybody wanna try her again?
Lucy Pinder

[/URL] [/IMG]

 

maybe because you can see her tits anytime you want. there's a reason pornstars and nude models aren't faked - no need.

 

Tits are obviously the only thing an xray has to offer.

 

And most pics of them have been shopped before release to stop pervs like us from doing exactly what this thread is about :damnit1:

 

Dakota Fanning - My attempt
Only used Brightness/Contrast. Color Balance, Exposure and Shadow/Highlight

 

Untrue - tits are more commonly displayed in thinner material, but there are many instances where the pussy can be brought out too like the Lucy Pinder pics above. Here are some of my past works.

Maria Menounos

Hayden Panettiere

Katy Perry

Britney Spears

 

That's all I use, I'm a newbie at this. I use Gimp and use only color levels, color balance brightness/contrast. I do not know how to use the dodge and burn tool or any of the other tools. I usually start with Levels, the brightness contrast. Then the balance and if needed hue.

 

I use dodge and burn tool (in Gimp), if need for small shadow correction or select nipples (when I see nipples), but you do not use with default setting! I use with 25% opacity, or harder 50% opacity.
Second version for burn (and maybe better for skin correction): use normal Paintbrush tool, but set from Normal mode to Dodge or Burn mode, and use with (25-50%) opacity. This version I like, because I can select brush for this, but for burn tool not.

I use two method:
1. If see any nipples on photo (lighter version):
- duplicate photo to second layer
- desaturate second layer
- change contrast and brightness desaturated layer
- select her clothes, cut this
- colorize this to skintones, play with hue, saturation, lightness too, maybe color balance
- burn nipples for better contrast, colorize nipples
- duplicate clothes from original pictures to a new layer over second layer
- airbrush to third layer with special color (fff000)
- color to alpha on third layer and desaturate
- cut unwanted parts

2. harder method, when not see nipples, but maybe:
- duplicate twice original picture
- third layer use multiply or screen (for lighter or darker clothes)
- merge third layer to second layer, and duplicate again second layer, and again use multiply or screen
- if see any nipples, decompose to LAB
- deactivate AB layers, and tuning L layer with contrast, brightness
- I use Unsharp mask for better nipples contrast
- L layer grab to original picture like a layer
- play with method 1 steps.

 

Sarah Shahi

 

I totally wasn't being sarcastic.

 

Hey C-T,

Sorry but your examples look like fakes to me. Not all of your work just these....

 

*sigh* I've explained this countless times. I use traditional x-ray techniques (Brightness, Contrast, Saturation, and sometimes Hue) to bring out the hidden details in my BCS image, and from there I use colorization for my enhanced images to make them more pleasing to the eye. I don't draw or paste in anything, but the color is definitely artificial. I grew tired of the colors being distorted when making the adjustments to see more details, so I started using colorization to make the illusion of transparency more complete. Anyone using the basic adjustments can get the same results as my BCS image (my "proof" of what I represent in the final image), and that is why I always post the original image so people can see where it came from and hopefully try it themselves.

 

you should make a youtube video of your works and prove the doubters wrong.
also it'd be a great tutorial as well.
just a thought.
cheers

 

I just looked at the first on the list (Maria) and it is so obvious the amount you draw in, etc.
And dont tell us all it is just colorization and crap. If you all want to enjoy looking at doctored Fakes, fine. Enjoy.
But all we are looking at is Fake, Fake, Fake. Just be honest here and we will respect you more for that.
(Waits for the BS excuses and explanations)

IMO off course. Look and see for yourselves. :2cent:

 

Why is this any different than using the burn/dodging tool? Isn't it rather arbitrary to say on technique that alters the color of the pixels is OK while the other is a 'sin'?