The Celebrity X-Ray Thread

because i'm totally in love with the idea of undressing her

 

if she's not a celebrity, nobody is. i even got veins to show up, here's 2 versions of the same pic. i'm not sure which one i like better, i think i overprocessed the second one.

 

i think i got ok results for how crappy the scans were of these

the second scan was way too pink, so i left the completely original xray along with my attempt to tone down the pinks and purples which were too overemphasized in my opinion

 

yeah yeah, this hardly needs xrayed, but i was kinda experimenting with trying to bring out actual skin tones through the color of the fabric and this one wasn't too difficult.

 

i gave this a quick shot, i dunno, it seems like the lower portion is thin but not very see-thru, and i didn't wanna stray from the thread rules of sticking with image manipulation only. what i am saying is .. i suck and i hope someone else can pull it off

 

mmmkay, i'm kinda proud of this one, i think i got a bit more detail than others i have seen. this is complete image manip, no painting, using presets on the copied layers like 'Linear Dodge' and 'Difference' and 'Exclusion'
The initail selection within the original layer is gaussian blurred just a bit, like 1.5 or so, and the brightness brought up a bit, then i just adjusted the other layer's opacity until i got something that looked... like... nips!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

I know xrayray tried it already but maybe it'll work better with a different photo of her?



I know everyone wants to see this

 

Do you have the original picture ? Thx!

 

On the Emma pics what you need for good results is a HQ version of these pics - just making them bigger doesn't make them better. You can see all the .jpg compression artifacts that are obscuring the details from blowing up a small LQ pic.

godawful - if you've got several pics ready to go, there's no need for separate posts minutes apart, just put them into one. Full names are also appreciated to aid in people searching out celebs in this huge thread. I know a lot of people also like seeing the original image to see where the X-ray details originates from, or they can try it themselves.

 

Dude, I don't want to argue with you - yes it's probably low light as well, but you only get .jpg artifacts like that from blowing up a small image. Bottom line is it can't be improved upon when the detail isn't in the original image - anything you think you may see might just be digital noise. I was just trying to make the point that without a better quality source image, there isn't much that can be done to make a better X-ray as the details are obscured with the noise.

 

thanks godawful. love the scarlett and natalie stuff. I wish the source pics were HQ though. Would you be open to giving those same shots a go if I post some HQ versions?

 

Kristen Stewart

posted by Rappy, here: http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=404378

 

godawful

nice pixs! Thanks

 

Lindsay Lohan out walking off her new puffed up lips

(original, BCS only)

 

thx god her puppies are all natural!

great work CT TY!

 

yeah if u can find a decent pic, i can give it a shot, i always have a hard time finding decent quality images, plus i'm trying to figure stuff out as i go and maybe i could do better this time around with some new pics.

and thx

 

Not sure if these have been tried before,but they look promising.







Keep up the good work guys

 

Lily Allen Leann Rimes Jennifer Garner Hillary Duff Christina Aguilera and ummm maybe Christina again, i'm not real sure but she has nice hooters whoever she is