INSTA Madisyn Shipman - red bikini on beach - 9/29/23

Didn't look like bikini in other posts

 

Here's the text of an E! story (from a Fox News interview) just out:

Madisyn Shipman is shaking the game.

The former child star most known for her role as Kenzie Bell in Nickelodeon's Game Shakers is officially part of the Playboy family. The 20-year-old is now a Bunny on its Centerfold app—which allow fans to subscribe to models for exclusive content—alongside influencers as Jordyn Woods and Sumner Stroh.

"It's such an honor to be part of Playboy," she told Fox News in a Sept. 29 interview. "You meet so many like-minded people, which is so rewarding."

According to Madisyn, she was introduced to the platform by a friend from her time on Nickelodeon. She only joined under the condition that she wasn't going to show everything because that's "not how my goals align."

"My fans love it," she shared. "And it just goes to show you that you don't have to show your body to make money and to make this a lucrative thing for you. I'm now able to fully self-fund my music career, which is wonderful. I have my own house. I'm fully taken care of. I've got so much financial freedom and I truly wouldn't be in this position if it wasn't for Playboy."

Madisyn continued, "I have always felt a sense of repression in terms of my sexuality and showing my body. And I think a lot of that is because I grew up on a Nickelodeon show. You're taught that you can't wear crop tops. You can't show too much skin. You've got to be presented as a little girl constantly."

The actress starred on Game Shakers for three seasons from 2015 to 2019.

When the show ended, Madisyn recalled experiencing "a little bit of an identity crisis because I didn't know who I was."

"Now, I'm reclaiming my power," she added. "I'm reclaiming my sexuality. I'm doing what makes me happy. And I have no issues posing in a bikini or a lingerie set. It's just me. I think it's so empowering to be able to pose like that and feel great in my skin."

 

Sorry to go off topic, but here is just a glimpse of my frustration in dealing with her/them.

She is probably a sweet person, but her handlers on her PB site drive me nuts. They act like they're talking to a 15 year old and when I try to correct them or point out what they're doing, they just appear short or slightly insulted. And believe me, I'm extremely nice about it because I feel weird having to do it. For instance, they offered 50% off of "explicit FULLY TOPLESS content". (They had it in full caps just like I typed) So, I asked what that would be with the discount. They said, "I just have nip slip babe. I can give it to you for $150." So I did a screen shot of the ad, circled "FULLY TOPLESS", and sent it. They said, "I usually do topless pics for $200. if you tip me 100, i'll send you some". I said I'd tip $100 for fully topless showing nipples and all. They said, "I don't think I can do that for $100 babe." I was totally confused. So, again, I asked how much are the fully topless pics in your ad? They replied, "What do you mean babe?" I sent the screen shot of the ad again where I had circled "FULLY TOPLESS". Their reply was, "your idea of fully topless is different from mine though." I said I didn't understand how there is more than one definition for that, but ok. They replied, "by topless i just mean i don't have a top on."

 

I really hope that the live stream where she had a "nip slip" isn't one and done. but I fear it was. She would make way more money if she just went nude or at least went topless more.

 

You are justified in your frustration and confusion. If somebody advertises FULLY TOPLESS photos and charges $200 for them, and it's only hand bra photos, then that's pretty shady. I'm sure she has a lot of fans that would gladly pay her $200 for hand bra photos. That's perfectly fine. But don't try to bait and switch people with false advertising.

 

Most of the content creators on OnlyFan (and I guess Playboy per the conversation) believe they can classify any word how ever they want. Yes, third picture from the original post is topless and even fully topless but 99.9% of the people buying something for the crazy prices probably do not agree that a shot of a the back of a topless model is topless.

There is only one definition of FULLY TOPLESS and they are not using it properly. Using their definition everyone is fully topless every day since they are topless under their clothing.

 

I had the same problem with Natalya Scudder (below deck star /now on PB). She promotes FULLY TOPLESS and I got almost the exact same responses (which I think means it’s the same team relying to all these). How I “misunderstood” what fully topless meant.

 

Yes, it's the PB team at work.