The Celebrity X-Ray Thread

Aww crap - this is starting to become what the Amateur thread decayed into. People, PLEASE post full names with any requests - if you didn't do it, go back and your post to add the missing names even if the celeb is obvious to you and everyone, that way they can be found with the search feature.

Second, please don't flood this thread with tons of requests, especially low-res/low quality ones. If you find a picture you like, spend the time looking for HQ/Hi-res versions of it, they are usually out there! Then, don't keep bumping the request if nobody attempts it - if we are interested, and have the time we'll try and grant your request if it's possible, but not every pic can be done as we aren't just faking it and pasting naked parts or buring in non-existent details.

Third, please take the time to understand what usually makes a good X-ray candidate. The technique requires a little bit of light to penetrate the clothes and bounce back off the skin or surface features (like visibly hard nipples) to get much detail, so a good strong flash helps in lower light conditions. It can also work if the material is thin and clinging to the skin revealing surface details. Single-color clothing is usually best. Paparazzi pics, red-carpet events, light weight sun-dresses, thin & tight T-shirts, or swimsuits (preferably wet) are also usually good candidates. Out-of-focus, grainy, low light, high contrast stripes/polka dots/floral patterns, heavy sweaters, leather, denim, or pics where they are obviously wearing bras usually don't make good candidates.

 

I'm sorry. I didn't mean to offend anyone by posting too many requests at once. I am new to this forum and don't know all the rules. How long does it usually take to get pics X-Rayed? I think the Carrie Underwood and Mary Elizabeth Winstead ones are definitely X-Ray worthy.

 

It takes as long as it takes, but typically if you don't see any action in a couple of days I wouldn't expect much. The Carrie Underwood pic is the only one that looks like a good candidate to me, but the pic is very small - can't you find a larger version or a set from the same event? I don't see any hope for the Winstead pic. Can you also add the names to the first post you made?

 

Here's Diana Chaves for you Bumperboy - I just did a brightness/contrast/saturation adjustment as I couldn't tell how large her areolas were from the pic, but you can see more than before.

I also removed the tags too.

 

Exactly. We are NOT replying to every request, and we are not analyzing each pic for everyone. If nothing happens, it's not going to get done, for one reason or another. DO NOT bump requests with lines like "Hey didn't you see this, when will it get done, I don't care if it's not very good, etc etc." This will be sure to get you ignored.

Here's what will probably NOT get done...
1: (And this is by far the most popular error) Obviously wearing a bra or tape or some other kind of undergarment. Don't bother. Except for maybe a one in a million shot they won't work, and we aren't even trying.

2: Multicolor print style clothes. Won't work.

3: Low Q pix. Almost never work. And if they are small to boot it's over.

4: Un named pix. Forget it.

5: "I don't care if it doesn't come out very good, I just want to see whatever is there" WE care.

6: White is ok, but very tough under bright sunlight ot other sources. Really needs to be a HQ pic to have a shot.

7: Highly reflective clothing tough for the same reasons. Also, fringy, frilly foldy kinds of things are impossible.

8: Multiple reposts. We aren't going to go into why your picture of Elisha Cuthbert won't work. Most of hers don't-she doesn't wear those kinds of clothes out very often. Trust me, we try them all.

9: Last but not least girls who appear naked everywhere under the sun. There is no point to doing an xray of Kelly Monaco. If you google her and turn off the family filter you will find hundreds of pics of her in dazzling HQ naked as a jaybird and displaying every pixel of her fabulous frame. Not that I've tried that........very often anyway. Pardon my drool.

Terrapin

 

C-through - thanks for your time. it ended just perfect.

 

C-thru...I'm not trying to deter you from doing your amazing work or anything, but doesn't this thread and up being a major painin the ass sometimes? Seems you spend a lot of time patiently re-explaing the rules over and over and over again..
More power to you man,,,great work.

 

gave it a go..

 

can someone have a go at Joss Stone?

 

mkultra, this is what I'm talking about when I rant on people just randomly using the burn tool to add darker circles for nipples wherever they see fit. This is not what we do here, so please don't make it up and fake your way through just to post. If you don't understand the process, then please don't participate.

 

These look promising as you can already see the nips anyway! ... Christina Milan and Caroline Trentini. Apols in advance if any are a re-post. Search didn't yield results for these photos.

 

c-through, i only used it where i see fit, if its not that good, sorry,
no prob, i wont post any more..

 

Hi!

Can your make x-ray in this celebrity? Pleas! ^^

 

Monkey Business, this is what I meant by finding the HQ versions of the pics you want to see.

http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=176364

And this is more of what you can expect from a good sized HQ pic -

 

Opo

Really man, back 2 pages.

T

 

katherine heigl


Terrapin

 

Didn't come out as well as I'd have liked, and if it wasn't emma watson I wouldn't put it up. Hopefully there will be better ones down the road.




Terrapin

 

How about asking people to request x-ray's in the Request thread or a new thread dedicated to x-ray requests?

It's gone to the point where every other page is requests only...

 

Well, it's manageable until recently it seems, when we started getting a lot of bumps and junk requests. And a lot of people would ignore that and put them here anyway. Or we'd have a bunch of "Hey, what about my request in the request thread-" posts, which we are already experiencing.

Really, if we could avoid that it would be ok. If a request doesn't get done pretty quickly it means for some reason it didn't work.

Not a bad idea tho. I just think then we'd wind up with 2 threads full of the stuff we're seeing here now.

T