The Celebrity X-Ray Thread

edited:

seem to me like she's wearing some sort of covering tissue .... can't really see through ...

 

Can somebody take a crack at this one please?

 

Lauren Cohan
original

edited

 

MariaLuisa Jacobelli
originals


edited

 

that's kind of straining the "celebrity" title a bit. Biggest credit I can find is Temptation Island 2020

 

Hailey Baldwin. Saw this on her subreddit. No idea where it's from but it appears to be from some magazine.

 

can this be xrayed? i dont currently have photoshop installed on this device

 

not sure how to edit but looks the the other nip has been shopped off. pics from her insta btw

 

I don't think it's been shopped off. It's just blown out of visibility due to the lighting. The top is not semitransparent at all so you can't exactly do an xray, but yes you can make the pokey a bit more noticeable.

 

yeah it sucks theres not more with the same top, i tried to find a few more for comparison yesterday

she wears really thick bras in most pics for some reason

 

Who's the celeb? You should always post a name even if it's obvious to most people so it can be found with the search tool later. Also, please use the clickable thumbnail BB code for pictures

 

was trying to figure that out. didnt see an icon for it, just the image icon

no edit button either

the celeb is hunter king

 

Kira Kosarin. I've tried plenty of her photos without any real luck. Wish this one was a bit higher resolution but I thought it came out reasonably well. Because it was lower res, I ran the finished x-ray through an online AI enhancer, which might've added a little sharpness to it.

 

I think that might be a case of wishful thinking. Image is so small, dark, and with the .jpg compression it just doesn't leave much to see. Once the details are lost through resizing & the .jpg compression, they can't be brought back even with software enhancement.

 

Pretty sure you did a deep nude on the top and then just faded it into the original image so it looks like an xray

 

Fudefrak, absolutely no such thing. I've been doing x-rays and posting here for years and have never "faked" an x-ray.

C-through, not sure what you mean by "wishful thinking." I did this x-ray as I do all others. I ran the finished x-ray through the AI enhancer, not before hand. Is it possible I got it wrong and got fooled by artifacts, and noise in a relatively low res photo? Possibly. I can say I have done dozens and dozens of x-rays (if not a 100 or more) in the past that I do not post if they don't look "right" or don't meet certain subjective standards of mine or if I'm not pretty confident of the end result. If I'm not pretty confident of the end result, I don't post it.

This one was trickier and I was "fooled" on the first attempt by the seam in the bikini/bra top. When I got it done, it didn't "look right" and I reversed all the way back to the transparent frames and looked again. Admittedly, this was not one where the areola was clear and obvious and jumped right out, but looking at it again I thought I could see the outline of the areola with a spot for the nipple in the center. I then outlined the areola and darkened it to "bring it out." In the finished product, it certainly looks like a nipple in the center of the areola, and I did not put that there. The overall positioning of the areola looks to be right, as well. So, I felt pretty confident of the end result and posted it.

People that have never tried to x-ray have a misconception of what the process entails and what comes out when you begin the process. In most cases. the areola and nipple are mere shadows and need to be brought out via shading. I've showed this before when including the sequence photos, one of which I did recently. C-through, you used to do x-rays so I assume you understand the process, but many do not.

Nevertheless, just say the word and I'll delete it, or if you have moderator powers in this thread, feel free to do so. BTW, when was the last time you posted an x-ray? I don't even know why I bother as this thread is largely dead and all the great x-rayers from years ago seem to have moved on and few seem to appreciate the efforts when someone does post a decent x-ray.

 

Just because I'm not actively posting like I used to (as I don't have as much spare time) I still know how to do it, and know what it takes as far as source material to extract a confident image. The original you posted lacks much of the detail in the cropped image you posted as your x-ray, and much more compression noise; Not sure why that is when the x-ray is nearly double the size if it wasn't cropped. You said that you didn't use the AI enhancer till after your x-ray was done, but I've never seen this much detail improvement when it's been lost to .jpg compression algorithms. If it can improve the details that much, it should be employed before not afterwards.

My goal in commenting is never to discourage, but I'm also a bit of a purist when I see something that just doesn't look right. I also will do my investigation through image adjustments before I make any comment, and I just can't see any reliable evidence in the source image which can't be distinguished from .jpg compression noise when the image is this small and not well lit. It may be what you show, but with the surrounding artifacting I just don't have the confidence it's accurate. I don't care if it stays or not, I'm not a moderator. I just try and keep this thread as pure as possible. Appreciation is given by members in likes when they see something they enjoy, but they also expect to see accuracy here.

I have tried to help others over the years but few seem to want to take up the art of the x-ray, and the celebs seem to also have learned to take precautions and aren't wearing clothing that lends itself to a good x-ray much anymore. There's also a lack of good paparazzi pics to choose from like there used to be. Most of the celeb images are taken, chosen, and posted by the celebs themselves on their social media instead of being photographed by professionals, which limits HQ, well lit, x-rayable content significantly. This is an example of such a self posted, LQ, poorly lit, compressed image, and that's what I was trying to say in the first place.

 

I'm posting the finished x-ray that was sent through the AI enhancer and three "progress" photos. I didn't really see a great deal of difference between the finished x-ray and the AI enhancement. A little bit of sharpness added to the face was about all. Although I had closed gimpshop, I started over to show what I saw when working the photo up. The last photo was over-contrasted, which sometimes helps in identifying the underlying detail. It still looks like the outline of the areola to me, and in the right area. Enlarge the photos and judge for yourself.

 

I still don't understand why the original pic which was half the size is much less detailed & compressed than the other versions you posted. I'm basing my conclusions on the original source pic