DEBATE Leaks discussion thread - August 2017

Yeah but seeing her spread on that bed would be killer! Oh, I want more leaks!!

 

Your face will, when nothing happens!

 

That's what I'm afraid of. It's a shame that Nyx pulled out. It'd be better just to drop everything rather than messing around and stuff.

 

I remember the rumors from the previous years about the supposed leakes that were gonna happen on the fappening anniversary. Guess what, nothing happened. I doubt this time it's going to be different. What I don't get is why would someone make other lists with another date coming so soon after what happened with Nyx. Do they really expect us to buy this?

 

For how much money are the sets traded for? Or is it only a set for a set kind of deal?

 

For any good sets it seems like it's trades only.

 

You're kidding right? She won the oscar last year ffs. What does she have to do?

For more than the actual person would charge for a nude photoshoot.

 

About tree fiddy

 

Damn Loch Ness Monster

 

Not only has Alicia been completely naked in the past, back and front, but she also has a proper sex scene in upcoming film Tulip Fever the trailer for which is already out and contains said scene. For her set to have any value she'd have to be having an orgy with half of Hollywood.

 

The biggest sums ever. huge YUGE amounts.

 

Perhaps there are some explicit photos of her and Fassbender

 

Maybe a pussy shot of Vikander. That is better than any nude scene.

 

It has already been said: leaks are something different, and it doesn't really matter if the amount of exposure is equal or lesser than the one already shown onscreen. There are other reason that make them appealing and valuable.

I remember a user (maybe it was you, I don't really remember the nickname) saying almost the same thing that you are saying now about Allison Brie's set, and yet that set, although pretty mild, is one of the most appreciated. And I agree: I had already seen her breasts in Glow, but her set is great nonetheless.

 

Private pics are hotter simply because you're not supposed to see them. It doesn't matter what an actress has shown in the past. That's a performance, leaks are real moments.

 

Ok, let's not compare it to Brie, that set had full frontal and well-lit shots of her breasts at a time when they were at their best by far. For Vikander I get that something is better than nothing, but I'd much rather get a simple topless of a celeb that's never been naked, than a gynecological pic of Alicia.

 

Sorry if this has been covered, but around the same time as the Maria pic dropped in the Vola, a pic showed up that looked similar to Sarah Hyland in the middle of kissing a dick. I have no idea how to upload to an image sharing site, but just curious if anyone else caught it.

 

Couldn't agree more. I've seen many people wish to see (even) more pics of Miley and Rihanna and other celebs who have done a lot of nudity in the past. I'd much prefer to see nudes of celebs who have never done nudity and said they'd never do it. Now that would be great to see.

 

Well, I can't disagree with that. I'm just saying that a good set of a celebrity that has already been naked onscreen remains a good set, and it can be more... alluring, maybe, because of the intimacy that it somehow suggests.

 

Ashley Tisdale, Elisha Cuthbert, Ellie Kemper, Sophie Turner....if any of them turn out to be true I'll be a very happy guy!