NUDITY Barbara Palvin - Love Magazine, Issue 18 (2017)

It's a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham.

 

I think what's going on here is that Barbara's in the same magazine with a topless Emily Ratajkowski and does not wish to have her breasts compared to a clearly superior set of tits. Even Hannah Ferguson is covering her tits, and Hannah herself has a great rack. That is the awesomeness of emrata's perfect pair at work.

 

True, but this is the same issue that Alexa Chung topless shot comes from. She ain't scurrd!

 

That's because she's not competing for the exposure.

 

Exposing your breasts to a few people you know & trust and not wanting to expose them to the world in a magazine are not mutually exclusive.

 

But why would she need to expose them at all if it's not part of the shoot?

 

Nice pics

 

this is just a theory- but those screenshots could be made up from a delusional fan that's disappointed in her nudity so it was an attempt of damage control as to fit his/her idealistic narrative.

we need CSI: Phun on this

 

why bother with pasties when you have no problem being topless on set?
there are countless pictures of her at photoshoots covering her breasts only with her arms etc. and she doesn't seem shy at all, just doesn't seem to want the whole world to see them.

 

But here's what I don't get: if she doesn't want people to see them, why take the risk to pose naked in the first place, why not do the whole shoot implied or covered topless? Why not tell the photographer not to take any frontal shots of her boobs, to only shoot from distant angles and such?

Let me give you an example. When Barbara posed for Lui last year, she wore pasties over her nipples so that nothing could be shown. So why not do the same here if she had no intention of showing them? That's why I'm not buying this. To me that topless pic looks exactly like the kind models use all the time when they pose naked in magazines.

So I stand by my original theory. Barbara was initially ok with posing naked for Love, but then something/somebody made her change her mind at the last minute and now she regrets posing topless. If indeed it was her in those instagram posts.

 

She was not wearing pasties in the Lui photoshoot and she poses naked because she works with some of the biggest professionals in the industry that shouldn't make this kind of mistakes.

 

Yes she was, go take another look.

 

Great pics, not sure about the story though. I feel like in this day and age people would be really careful going bare breasted in shoots if they didn't want to risk the pics getting leaked, right?

 

again, because she's working with professionals she trusts?

The one with the black tape X over her nipples aside there is only the "October" pic that looks like it could have been pasties but considering the level of retouching it might have just been digitally done. In 4 other pics with her arms/hands/clothes covering her breasts you can see she's not wearing pasties.

 

lol

 

that whole thing smells like someone pulled a "leave Britney alone"!

 

I don't care about the story. I just hope there's moar

 

great

 

Couldn't agree more, that's why I don't buy the story that her boobs were supposed to be covered in the magazine. Let's see if she'll sue the magazine if any of this is true.

 

No mention of any of this in the entertainment media, so I call bullshit. I mean c'mon guys, if there was a fraction of truth to any of it the tabloids would be all over it! It's been two days now, this kind of story is their bread and butter. Yet not one peep.