Why are all the woman in star war movies small chested?

Here a question in honor of the new star wars movie that is coming today.

Have you noticed That all the woman in star war movies (galaxy) have small chests. You never notice any large chested woman. Does traveling through hyper-space cause woman to grow small breasts?

You would think at least one woman human Jedi would use the Force to giver herself a large chest that are as perky as the day is long!

So where are all the voluptuous woman in the star wars galaxy??

What your opinion on this matter.

 

Carrie fisher had a nice rack

 

The Rancor owner was stacked.

A lot of the female heroes in Star Wars movies tend to be tomboyish/have no issues getting their hand's dirty....I think smaller breast fits that narrative better. Plus most of the women tend to wear more military-ish (non-feminine) clothing that hides curves under thick clothing...it's more about practicality rather than sex appeal.

Finally...it comes down to percentages. Most thinner/smaller women (like many of the Stars Wars women protagonist: females in new movie, Daisy Ridley, Natalie Portman, etc...) will usually have smaller breasts (As and Bs). Most aren't a genetic anomaly like Emily Ratajkowski.

 

Will never happen. Firstly Star Wars is now owned by Disney. Its gonna be hopelessly generic and completely tailored to be as innofensive and vanilla as possible while simultaneously attempting to exploit young children and geeks to purchase overpriced pieces of plastic.
Secondly the tweets by two of the writers Gary Whitta and Chris Weitz describing the film as about a White Supremiscist Empire vs Women and a multicultural group kinda tells you the film is firmly in the feminist and multicultural ideological camp. Neither is very big on sexy women
Yeah so no chance of large busty women in the new Star Wars. No more golden bikini slave girls either.
The sad thing is this rot has infected tv too. If Star Wars were made by HBO I still wouldn't bet on any sexy Jedi let alone nudity. The days HBO meant good tv and good nudity is gone.

 

As was mentioned, Leia had a legendary set. That said, the female leads in the new films have tended to be built more athletically (all the better for force-jumping or whatever), and since breasts are largely fat deposits, it's hardly shocking that women with low BMI and lithe body types don't have giant racks.

 

"In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only war...and small tits."

 

I weep for the far future.

 

They actually had to tape Carrie Fisher's breasts down during the making of Episode IV because she was TOO stacked.

 

Westworld is on HBO, which is definitely good TV and packed with nudity.

And what, were you hoping the white supremacist empire would be the good guys?

 

Westworld was not great nudity. Thandie Newton deserves praise she definitely delivered but her scenes were always edited from the worst angles. Usually from the side, too dark are panned to fast or flat on her back. Compared to the first 5 seasons of4 TrueBlood WestWorld was tame. While WW is a good show it is definitely not good nudity. Apart from the worst orgy scene on tv, worse than True Detective S2 there were only 3 actresses nude the entire season with only one decent Fullfrontal. Yes dude it matters to me. I dont come to Phun to discuss womens issues. Im here for possible celeb nudity.
As for Star Wars since the original trilogy I always supported the Empire. The rebels seemed like wishy washy hippies. I still dont understand how a senate comprising over a thousand worlds and alien races could effectively make any decisions.
I havent seen Rogueone so I wont jump to the conclusion that I support the Empire but that is moot. The question is why politicize an adventure film? Who cares what your political leanings are when you go to the cinema you go to relax and spend a lot of money with nothing to show for it afterwards. A bunch of activist writers deciding to declare the Empire is Trump supporters thus White Supremiscists and Hillary supporters are the rebels so only women leaders and non white guy secondary characters is stupid.

 

The twi'lek women were always stacked. Even in animated form!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

They don't want you distracted by the REAL force.

 

That was because. Lucus wanted to show her a young girl (she was 17/18 when they were filming the first one for release in 1977) who turns into a warrior woman. The virginal princess who because a non virgin queen throughout the film series! They were not that big but was bigger than lucus wanted. Carrier and Lucus both joked in many interviews. There no breasts in the Empire!

Carrie only 5 1 inheight. I guess they look big in Return of he Jedi. But than again. They may just look big with movie magic!

1978 chest here:
http://www.imagebam.com/gallery/7gakvr5br2rifxredjqoxnkclm9zwst4

Unknown dates here on her chest:


The other odd thing. Is the actress playing Jay in Rouge one is age 33. They are saying she 21 in the movie:

 

Hmmmn.... when I hope to see big tits in a movie, I generally opt for porn. Just sayin'

 

cause it hella sexier???... more than a handfull is a waste and quite nasty when they get older and lose muscle tone

 

Age is irrelevant in Hollywood films or TV. You're as old as they say you are.

 

Big or small... Still lovely!

 

Well, the women in Star Wars have to do a lot of running so I imagine small boobs are pretty advantageous.

 

And small breast don't turn into pancakes when they get older?