Emma Watson - see-thru top from 2014

Based on EXIF data, it was taken May 11th, 2014. That seems to be shortly before her charity appearance at Windsor Castle on May 13th. When she was appearing in Davos Switzerland in January 2015 to promote her work for UN Women, she posted many different shots similar to these that seem to have been taken by her stylist as "proof of concept" for various looks she might wear to the events.

My instinct is that these pictures are the same sort of thing, for an outfit for the Royal Charity event that was clearly either rejected outright (for obvious reasons) or modified heavily so as not to be so revealing.

It's hard to imagine that there'd be more than these of this particular outfit, and equally hard to imagine them being released through any other means than hacking.

Just my guess, but an educated one.

 

I'm sure if you asked one of the mods they could help you post it.

 

I have to ask this question: are most of the people who like her in the Millennial generation? I've ventured into several threads dedicated to her and I don't see what the excitement is over her. I can only guess that you had to be a kid and grew up seeing her in the Harry Potter movies.

 

Or some people prefer a pretty face (whatever they consider pretty) and a delicate body over a more explicit body type. Trying to figure out other people's tastes is a waste of time, if you want my opinion.

 

No

 

Class vs ass......

 

Pretty much. I'm closing in on fifty and I love this girl. She's lovely, intelligent, and elegant. Oh and she's got killer legs. What's not to like?

 

Since when were the HP movies just for kids? Who do you think took them to see the movies too...?? Loved the HP movies, and I'm 46... Love Emma too, even though she'd young enough to be my own kid; but not; so it's fine.....

 

I've been making fakes for several years and one thing that makes me think these are real is the fact someone would have had to make two fakes.
I've lined these up in PS and clicked between the two and there are subtle differences in the nipples with light etc. and also the position has changed subtly between the two images.

It's tough enough making 'see through' fakes and to create one that was this real would be an achievement. I'm not sure anyone would then go to all the trouble of doing it again and creating all the subtle differences. If they had used the same nipples/blending/opacity and simply pasted it over the second picture it would be obvious, but that's not the case.

Can't believe I went all CSI on this

 

If the image is saved to your computer/device upload the image to this website http://imagezilla.net/ and then copy/paste the BB code in your post. If the image is posted on another website then copy the image URL and paste it on http://imagezilla.net/ then copy/paste the BB code in your post.

So to answer your question, mostly Millenials, yes, but also a bunch of dirty old men as witnessed above.

 

I may be old but I'm not dirty. Well, not as often as I'd like to be! :wink:

 

I've never seen a Potter film (on purpose) but I find her rather attractive. I don't go crazy over her but she's definitely very pretty.

 

J3scribe told me how to post a pic so lets see if I did this right.



As you can see in this see thru, the odd nipple placement is the same from this pic to the one posted originally in this thread. So I call real.

 

you did, but you could have linked the original post / thread as well, with Sentinel67 already pointing out that they're asymmetrical

 

He may not have been aware of that thread.

 

Maybe both pics are fake Being serious though, I can see how the pic that started this thread could be real as she (apparently) never meant for it to be seen but this pic looks like a magazine pose or something. I can't imagine she's intentionally pose for a pic like this with her nipples showing...

 

Looks more like a test shot when an actress will try on a bunch of different outfits.... They're usually used by stylists and a costumer/wardrobe dept.

 

That particular image has been given somewhat of and X-ray treatment. The published images are much darker and therefor less obvious.

See here: http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=977986&p=6975598&viewfull=1#post6975598

 

Meh....