Emma Watson - see-thru top from 2014

I was laughing my ass off when I saw the post "it's fake here is the original" and the "original" was in fact half the size of the actual original and had no exif data. Also whoever made it is probably reading this thread because he tried to fix the noise issue that slash_spd pointed out while faking the nipples but you can still see a faint blurry spot on one of the boobs. The amount of ppl trying to cover this up is amusing and is yet another proof that the pics are legit.

 

deleted

 

Something similar was done with Lindsay Lohan back in 2010.
When she was caught pantiles getting of a boat in Venice someone quickly faked a picture that covered up her exposed pussy in photoshop (based on the shirt colour of the man helping her ashore).
For a while it created enough doubt for the original picture to be deemed a fake, but eventually the rest of the photos came to the surface proving that it was indeed the panties-picture that was the fake one.

 

When considering WHY her nips may have been shopped out.... Consider what SI do to most of their sheer swimsuit shots..?

We all know there should be nipples on display, but they aren't seen...?

In guessing that if this is real, then the shot was sitting there ready to be sent out, then someone spotted the nipples & decided to shop them out before passing it on..? Not too much of a stretch of the imagination.....:2cent:

 

So the photographer who took them shopped them before release and now the originals have been leaked.

Confused, you will be after tonight's episode of Phun:CSI.

 

Cute pokies.

 

It is. Zoom in and you can see that a blur tool or smear tool was used over the breasts to hide the pokies.

It was posted on another forum in an attempt to crowd out the more revealing ones, and even though, between its ridiculous filename ("!!!!!ORIGINAL.jpg,") empty EXIF data in place of the detailed data on the original, and childishly-obvious pixelation problems, it's an obvious fake, the mods over there are going all-in claiming this is the real one and the revealing ones are fakes. As soon as some guy posted this, they moved the originals to the fake" thread. When I reported the post of this image to them as the fake, they appended the post with a message that they're leaving it in place unless they receive absolute proof. When I posted that proof, they moved THAT to the fakes thread as well, and posted that all "discussion" of the veracity of the post must also take place in the fakes thread.

So they're actively trying to discredit apparently real pics, and promoting a fake to do it. How weird is that?

 

My guess is it's someone wanting to stop or discourage the spread of the pics, as they're likely stolen. I'm in sympathy with the motivation, but you can't fix hacking with fraud.

 

Judging by your avatar, I'm guessing she would be more than happy to show you the goods. So please post those pics when you get the chance.

 

If she really echoed the feelings of my avatar, and showed me all for my camera-phone convenience, I'd keep that the hell to myself. Leaking that would pretty much guarantee that I'd see no more!

 

Ah yes, very good point. She would not be too pleased about that.

 

I like dem little titties

 

Can't believe I got banned from uploading on FotoForensics for checking it. Pornographic or sexually explicit it was not. Fuck there wasn't even nudity :roll:

 

What the hell is that site?! You're telling me that people make fake pictures that do not involve pornography?

 

That can't be right.

 

I have noticed that this is one of the few places online where the 2 original pics aren't considered fake. For some reason, many other forums and celeb sites refuse to accept the existing evidence and are treating these pics as fake and the modified pic as real. I guess they refuse to believe that Emma would ever pose like that, or who knows what. In any case, I find this pretty strange.

 

Well they should take our opinions here as fact because we're what you call experts,...don't try this at home.

 

I recognized this "censored pic" as a fake because I've made hundreds of fakes, so I recognize a bad attempt (of which, I've made many, especially early on). While their are undoubtedly many people better than me, this is what a censored original created by a marginally competent faker might look like.


Leave a hint of pokies and the grain/noise in the image undisturbed. This was about 5 min work.

 

Has anyone figured out the source of the original pic?

Was it a hack, did she send it to somebody?

Could there be more?

 

There has actually been another see-thru shot of Emma but nobody on the sites I visited believed it was a real pic. But comparing nipple placement on that pic to the nipple placement on these pic, they are identical. Wish I knew how to post pics, I'd share the first pic for comparison.