Amber Heard granted domestic violence restraining order against Johnny Depp

And its exactly that type of attitude from the guy that you responded to, that gives women the notion that they can physically attack men, because we're just "supposed" to take it. This is why women think they can get away with irrational behavior. Because ultimately, there's always going to be certain men who will enable their toxic behavior no matter what. Let me ask you something. I already stated it's been proven that 70% of domestic abuse is INITIATED by women. Why do you think most women would do such an illogical thing as to attack something that is physically superior to it?

 

I blame a woman's parents for not teaching her to respect a man's boundaries. Imo, boys are taught that there are consequences for our actions at an early age, ie "if you hit someone, they'll probably hit you back". I believe less and less women are taught these simple life lessons, and are instead indoctrinated to run to an emasculated man for help whenever her behavior catches up to her.

Case in point, I'll be 30 this year, and I've never had a man slap/punch me at any point. But I've had a female (around 27-28 years old, meaning she should know better) slap me once, just last year, because I wasn't doing what she "wanted" me to do. And she got slapped back immediately after, just to show her that her entitlement meant nothing to me. I didn't punch, kick or anything like that. I merely slapped her a little harder than she slapped me. Long story short, she NEVER tried to get physical with me again, and she blamed her actions on her parents (who she admitted let her act however she wanted). Bottom line, a woman will push your boundaries up until you stop her. It's in their nature to do so. This chick and I are good friends, and I let her know that on that day, that I introduced options to her life.

 

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but don't try and pull the morally superior thing with me for stating mine. And if you want to be the guy who's "man" enough to let women physically abuse him because society says that's what you're supposed to do, that's fair enough. Also where did I state that I was in favor of a man knocking a woman "senseless" as you put it?

 

wow big man, never been in a real fight but slapped a girl once.

 

I also call for a boycott on Johnny Depp's movies.

Not because he may or may not have been violent, but because his movies suuuuuuuuuuuuck....when was the last time he did something even remotely watchable?

After looking at his imdb page i concluded that since the first pirates movie (2003), the only thing i've been able to sit through was black mass....which wasn't good but at least did not make me consider ripping my eyes out to end the pain...

How is he considered a "moviestar" at this point?

He better hope his lawyers find a way to keep his money, his career is turning to shit.

 

In interviews he is like a weird Michael Jackson actor representative :2cent:

 

How did i take away your right to state your opinion?

You stated it exactly where I stated that you should let women physically abuse you, because that's what you are supposed to do.

I'll let you be the physically superior person who puts others to their place.

 

I'm an aspiring amateur boxer, so I've kept my "real" fighting inside the ring where it belongs, and where I can hopefully get paid for doing so down the line. Thanks for jumping straight to assumptions, though. But yeah, that just proves my point about how women will act ILLOGICAL, even further. The girl I spoke of KNEW I loved boxing and the endless hours of training, yet she still tried to get physical with me regardless, simply because she thought she could use her hurt feelings and "you can't hit a girl" entitlement as an excuse to do.

 

and the fact you think all women are naturally illogical is very convincing proof you a sort of 1880 level of sexist.

 

Your first sentence from your previous response gave your sanctimonious attitude away already, or is there another way to interpret, "I only left the part of the post that somehow could be considered worth answering to." as anything but dismissive or arrogant? If you don't agree with what I'm saying, use logic to refute it. But I'm not going to let somebody try and dictate to me what's right or wrong based on nothing but their opinion. Opinions which you've managed to state as fact by the way, but its all good. ;-)

 

I dont want to Point out RUNVS in particular but i do notice a lot of replies with a similair structure. You find someones argument wrong. So you spend a reply posting that hey friend your wrong. Okey fair enough but where is your own thought on the subject. Atleast the other member took the time too post an argument and presented it for the rest of us to read. All i get from this is that you Think he is wrong but it would be nice with your own standpoint. Im not expecting a lecture or a whole novell but why not give us something.

 

I never said ALL women, but feel free to twist my words around if it makes you feel better. And I love how the word "sexist" is arbitrarily thrown out when a guy gives an opinion based on logical reasoning and examples to back said opinion up. I believe it to be TRUE, that if you get a woman emotional enough, more often than not they become illogical/irrational because they're going off of their emotions. So feel free to explain why you think me making an observational point about a woman's nature is "sexist" as opposed to what might actually be the truth.

Back to the topic, being a star for as long as he's been, I thought Depp would've been smarter than to marry a gorgeous 30 year old actress. I mean, as someone to mess around with just to keep you happy, sure. But to MARRY her? What exactly did he THINK was gonna happen if the marriage went south?

 

I love double standards.

 

it is implied in their post.......

 

Dismissive maybe, but it also shows I took the time to read what you have to say. I just don't consider what you said to be of worth. Doesn't mean I take away your right to express your opinion.

I did use logic. I said you don't have to knock her senseless, you can just sudbue her. And you ignored what I said by clinging on the exaggeration I used to put my point across. Exactly as you did now. You blamed me for basically putting words in your mouth (knocking her senseless), went ahead and did the same (guy who's "man" enough to let women physically abuse him because society says that's what you're supposed to do), and then ignored me calling you out on it on the next reply.

Anyway, to make my point clearer. If a 13 year old boy punches you in the belly, do you punch them back or what?

 

Not doubting you, but I'd be interested in reading that CDC study.

 

Fair enough.
http://newscastmedia.com/domestic-violence.htm

"The mainstream media seems to imply that men are the sole perpetrators of violence against women, but research proves otherwise. A recent study by Harvard Medical School conducted a survey of 11,000 men and women and found that 50% of the violence was reciprocal. Both men and women also took responsibility for being equally violent in the heat of passion.
The Harvard study found that when violence was one-sided, meaning unprovoked, both men and the women themselves who took the study said 70% of the time it was the women who committed violence against the men."


http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020

"At the time of this study, Daniel J. Whitaker and Linda S. Saltzman were with the Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Tadesse Haileyesus is with the Office of Statistics and Programming, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Monica Swahn is with the Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

"Results. Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Reciprocity was associated with more frequent violence among women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.9, 2.8), but not men (AOR=1.26; 95% CI=0.9, 1.7). Regarding injury, men were more likely to inflict injury than were women (AOR=1.3; 95% CI=1.1, 1.5), and reciprocal intimate partner violence was associated with greater injury than was nonreciprocal intimate partner violence regardless of the gender of the perpetrator (AOR=4.4; 95% CI=3.6, 5.5)."


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/ <<<<< The original article, complete with all the stats, graphs, and breakdowns of reciprocal (and non reciprocal) violence by age.

"Among violent relationships, nearly half (49.7%) were characterized as reciprocally violent. Women reported a significantly greater proportion of violent relationships that were reciprocal versus nonreciprocal than did men (women = 51.5%; men = 46.9%; P< .03). Among relationships with nonreciprocal violence, women were reported to be the perpetrator in a majority of cases (70.7%), as reported by both women (67.7%) and men (74.9%)."

Its funny how nobody brings up how violent women are in this particular society. But the propaganda of "women can do no wrong, and anyone who disagrees is either a misogynist, sexist, or an asshole" is easy to see through, for those who'll question it.

 

Having looked through Mr Depps filmography once again i am now convinced Ms heard deserves those 200 millions, she's clearly done more to earn them.

Yeah, all she had to do was having sex with Johnny Depp for a little over a year, but what has he done to earn that cash?

Play a incoherant drunk for 5 pirate movies?
Play a peyotesmoking native american in lone ranger?
Play a drug-abusing journalist in fear and lothing?
As far as i can tell that's not even ACTING!!!
He just shows up for work with a substance abuse problem...

Think about it, if you had to choose between having sex with Amber Heard for a year or having to watch ALL of those pirate movies again, which would YOU choose?

I gotta believe that even the straight women on this forum (assuming there are any...) would pick having sex with Amber, cause those movies are SHIT!!

 

California law states the spouse will get 50% of the money earned during the length of the marriage.
No she is not getting $200 million anyways.Probably get close to $20 million MAX.