Sarah Hyland - Alleged Leaked pics

Liver.

 

Laughed out loud hahaha thanks m8.

 

It sure seems like a lot of shrubbery for someone of her age.

 

Guess that this is proof that those are not actually Sarah in those pictures. Unlike other celebrities Sarah doesn't seem to care.

http://www.fashiontimes.com/article...brities-in-leaked-naked-photo-controversy.htm

 

Did you ever see the original Vanessa Hudgens' nudes? You needed a machete to find her cl^t.

 

^ Indiana Jones and the Temple of Poon

 

The media seems to think that all of these pictures are fake since Sarah Hyland isn't even acknowledging that these pictures exist.

 

If she keeps quiet, they will go away. There's no denying those hairy ass arms.

 

1. That could be any girl's hairy ass arms.

2. That scar that people are talking about isn't even in the right spot. It looks more like a c section scar then one near the belly button where she has her scar.

 

Okay, look at this picture and show me in any of the naked pictures, where this scar is? That's a pretty distinctive scar and it's not in any of these. Plus the girl in these has a pierced belly button, which Sarah doesn't have, nor any evidence of a past piercing that has been taken out.



Pic taken from here: http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=922574&highlight=hyland+bikini

 

Are you implying that photos of a girl without a face shot might be....gasp.....fake? That the Fappanators might have been....gasp....fooled or just plain wrong???? I am shocked I say, SHOCKED!

 

maybe looking at the wrong scar, there's another scar further down...

rotated the nude and compared it with a random of hers

it seems to match?

Mod Edit : No Imgur links here!
sorry, here it is again

 

Actually look at the OP shoot picture you're pinning your hopes on. You clearly see the big scar traveling even lower than the small scar you're pinning your hopes on. Here's that pic with a few boxes. Two of them are around the big scar, the third is around your little small scar. Notice how far below the small one the biggie goes? If that small scar is visible, then the big one should be as well, but it's not.

 

These random just pussy pics...Although some may be legit.. Are pretty disappointing. A wise man once told me... Turn em upside down and they all look like sisters..... :wink: That scar is miles away from the one in the bikini pic. Pics with the face and body.. We got something... Pics of just a pussy... I don't get the excitement... I've seen plenty and they all look pretty much the same on normal healthy women.

 

That pussy shot clearly isn't Sarah Hyland just like none of those photos are.

It is just one of the leaks where someone on 4chan decided to have fun with people by pretending that some random pictures out of the big pile of fappening pictures was of a certain celebrity.

 

Well one of the traders(if he is who he claims to be) was asked,
"Is Sarah Hyland legit? She looks like 12-13 yo in those pics , judging by her pussy"

and he replied,
"Yes, it's legit. Not underage."

http://pastebin.com/jPu5KF6g

 

But it doesn't. Pay attention to where the biggest scar is (in the bikini pic): exactly in the left hip. Meaning, a lot of inches away from the pussy. Just the opposite we can see in the pussy pic.

 

Sarah Hyland had her surgery on April 13th, 2012 according to her. She was 21 at the time. So it is possible that those pictures are really old. She would have still been legal and in her late teens when they were taken.

She has had kidney problems her whole life. So might have had minor surgery where that scar near the pussy is before the big transplant.

www dot people dot com/people/article/0,,20594945,00.html

Unfortunately these pictures weren't released with any exif data so we don't know how old they are.

 

I don't think this guy knows shit. He claimed the JoJo pictures were great. But didn't himself know they were fakes.

 

He claimed the JoJo pictures were "meh".

But that's true that he wasn't a hacker, just a trader who claimed he had pictures from an actress to offer (as if they were spare collectible cards), got a set in exchange, and parlayed his way into the ring from it. He offers zero details about how the accounts were hacked, but he may have secondhand intel about the level of protection surrounding the account. Which is why I imagine that what he says about Katy Perry (and other celebrities) is true. She would have been one of the most requested celebrities, and if there were pictures and a low level of protection, her account would have been hacked early on.

Remember that his idea of what makes a set "good", "great" or "meh" must be quite specific, and I agree that he is clueless on a few things. But if he thought that the JoJo set was legit, it must be because his source gave him sets that were legit.