1. Guest - Remember that Thread Prefixes are a search tool! Click on a Thread Prefix and all threads with the same Prefix in that forum will be offered to you. To dismiss click on X >>>
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Our gif only content threads have a rule where all thumbs must be posted as a static thumbnail that does not play. Currently imagebam made a change where they no longer produce static thumbs. Therefore, please do not use imagebam, or any host, that provides live playing gifs in those specific threads. If you see your gif playing once you post, try to use a smaller thumbnail and if that does not work use a different approved host.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. PHUN.ORG WILL BE TRANSFERRING TO A NEW HOSTER DURING THE NEXT 7 DAYS, AND SOME DISTURBANCE MAY BE EXPERIENCED. WE'LL KEEP YOU INFORMED AS DETAILS EMERGE.
  4. Can't Log-in?. If your password is no longer accepted but the email address registered in your profile is working, use the "Forgot Your Password?" routine. However, if your registered email address is unusable, create a new temporary phun account and contact S-type.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. ATTN: Imagehost picpie is infected with the "internet security warning" redirect that tries to take users hostage with an inescapable redirect. Avoid using picpie as an imagehost.
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Too many Alerts? Why not adjust your "Alert Preferences" in your Profile Page?
    Dismiss Notice
Thread Prefixes Do not use Imagebam in GIF Content Threads Hoster Change Log-in issues picpie Alerts out of control?

The Celebrity X-Ray Thread

Discussion in 'Creative Backyard' started by ericjlars, Jun 29, 2006.

Tags:
Page 573 of 815
  1. Kaleidoscope

    Kaleidoscope Life Rocks!

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,133
    Likes Received:
    6,679
    Enhanced
    [​IMG]

    Original
    [​IMG]
     
    Kaleidoscope, Nov 7, 2011
    #11441
    driller195, wazaa, rocky911 and 3 others like this.
  2. pogs

    pogs

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    8
    Anything on these?
     
    pogs, Nov 9, 2011
    #11442
    rocky911 likes this.
  3. intertemporal

    intertemporal

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    56
    quick attempt


    [​IMG]
     
    intertemporal, Nov 9, 2011
    #11443
    DrGontzo, stufarq and driller195 like this.
  4. intertemporal

    intertemporal

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    56
    I'm sure it is possible to get something out of her undies but I can't get a good view so I excluded that part.


    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    intertemporal, Nov 10, 2011
    #11444
    DrGontzo, johnmark, m.k. and 5 others like this.
  5. c-through

    c-through I see naked people! ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ 15 Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,586
    Likes Received:
    9,402
    I'm not seeing it on Cobie or Nathalie.

    Cobie's pic is a magazine scan instead of a direct digital image, so most of the fine detail & color depth is lost in the printing & re-scanning of the image. There is a faint areola outline (I think) but it's not the same size & location as being shown in the X-ray.

    Nathalie's screen caps aren't are worse, and I see even less detail to even guess the size or location of her nipples from those images, let alone have enough to do even a basic BCS image as there's just nothing there. Yes, there's some sort of a bump, but there's no indication if it's an undergarment, nipple shield, or the top of a puffy nipple.

    Bottom line - if you gotta guess without proper evidence, then you're just making it up, and this thread isn't about that.
     
    c-through, Nov 11, 2011
    #11445
    sirmartinfrobisher likes this.
  6. jackal652

    jackal652

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    2
    Kelly Brooke

    Please this pix needs to be xrayed! :)

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Thanks!
     
    jackal652, Nov 11, 2011
    #11446
  7. anvilusa

    anvilusa

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2010
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    297
    Gwen Stefani new


    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    anvilusa, Nov 11, 2011
    #11447
  8. tami

    tami

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    2
    Love the Emma watson picture,cool
     
    tami, Nov 11, 2011
    #11448
  9. tami

    tami

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yes please do miley cyrus.I would love to see it x ray of that.
     
    tami, Nov 11, 2011
    #11449
  10. c-through

    c-through I see naked people! ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ 15 Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,586
    Likes Received:
    9,402
    Nothing to get on Kelly Brooke - the hands can't be x-ray'd, and the netted shawl over her bottoms won't reveal anymore than you can already see.

    You can tell Gwen's wearing panties (nothing to write home about) and there's some extra covering up her breasts, so nothing to be gained unfortunately.

    We all keep an eye out for Miley since she's come of age, but not a lot of good x-ray candidates.
     
    c-through, Nov 11, 2011
    #11450
    mrramone likes this.
  11. durazno69

    durazno69

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    199
    Hope you liked ;) [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    durazno69, Nov 11, 2011
    #11451
    corbin_outlaw likes this.
  12. durazno69

    durazno69

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    199
    Enjoy!! [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    durazno69, Nov 12, 2011
    #11452
    DrGontzo, diwe, wazaa and 3 others like this.
  13. mrramone

    mrramone

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2007
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    71

    any takers???
     
    mrramone, Nov 12, 2011
    #11453
    johnmark likes this.
  14. sirmartinfrobisher

    sirmartinfrobisher

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    1,197
    Likes Received:
    4,141
    just for accuracy, I think this is who you are talking about (Brook not Brooke)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_Brook
     
    sirmartinfrobisher, Nov 12, 2011
    #11454
    johnmark likes this.
  15. RUNVS

    RUNVS

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    488
    Can anyone tell me how real these are as some of them look at little fake to me (but i am by no means a expert so i don't know for sure).
     
    RUNVS, Nov 13, 2011
    #11455
  16. durazno69

    durazno69

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    199
    Are real..
     
    durazno69, Nov 13, 2011
    #11456
  17. c-through

    c-through I see naked people! ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ 15 Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    3,586
    Likes Received:
    9,402
    Posting the original images along with the modified ones is always best so everyone can see what you started with. It looks like some liberties may have been taken, and remember not every bump is always a nipple.
     
    c-through, Nov 13, 2011
    #11457
    bigwillee likes this.
  18. m.k.

    m.k.

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2006
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    9
    Thanks buddy, as far as i remember there is no many attempt of her pictures.
    If you had more please post them.
     
    m.k., Nov 13, 2011
    #11458
    bigwillee and wazaa like this.
  19. Mr.1337Nobody

    Mr.1337Nobody

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    55
    Hey, I know people, have said that the burn tool, is okay to use, and while I agree, I must remind you TO STOP USING IT. YOU HAVE JUST PROVEN WHY IT SHOULD NOT BE USED... It should not be used TO SHOW SOMETHING.

    Burn Tool: Used to darken pixels.

    Thanks...
     
    Mr.1337Nobody, Nov 13, 2011
    #11459
    bigwillee and couger81 like this.
  20. The Lurker

    The Lurker Pixel Pusher ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ Ten Years of Phun

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    3,201
    Likes Received:
    22,245
    ^This.

    Not every image (and in fact, most images fall into this category) is a good candidate for X-ray technology. Even if the material (i.e. clothing) is promising, the front-/side-/back- lighting/luminance, chromaticity/saturation, and the like may not be. Many people overuse the Burn brush also, especially newbies. This tends to create the illusion of something that, based upon the data actually contained ('hidden') within the image/exposure, simply isn't there.

    Rather than trying to manifest something that isn't (i.e. 'fighting the image'), it is best to follow the path of least resistance, and go with (the information contained within) the image. That is ultimately the most rewarding, both for the image consultant, and the viewer.

    Otherwise, you're closer to creating Art, and further away from employing Science.

    Call it 'The Tao of X-ray'.


    Cheers,

    -TL
     
    The Lurker, Nov 13, 2011
    #11460
Page 573 of 815

Share This Page