The Celebrity X-Ray Thread

Hmmm. Let's see.
You 've made 13 posts since nov 2006, that's about 1 per 2 months.
You've also been so generous to thank 7 times in that period so that's about 1 per 4 months.
I don't think one should post alot, that's entirely up to them but you're not going to tell me you've only read 7 posts in those 2 years that were worthy of thanking for.
A thanks now and then keeps contributors going and there's nothing gay about showing your appreciation.

I believe this thread is now in the correct section, it's creative and thus belongs here. Any one can easily find it if they're really interested, hell even you found it.
A thread doesn't die because it's moved, it dies because of lack of contributions.

btw: real fans and regulars of this thread can easily edit some text with a link to it in their user CP.

 

He got wned:

 

here you go

 

Lacey Chabert.

 

Ressity

Nice job on Babs! She still has that unusual beauty. We dont get enuff of the older actresses in here.

 

I disagree for one reason alone..
I don't think it falls under creative.. giving it that moniker is basically giving those that produce fakes leeway to post them in this thread.. something that the regulars have been against since the very first page...we don't want the creative liberties posts..

JMHO

 

People who post fakes in here will no doubt get the usual treatment they usually get, aka don't post fakes in here. Idiots like me can contribute to the celeb forum by uploading pics but I couldn't x-ray, it takes creativity and brains to do it. In discussion with others before, this is the logical place for it, otherwise there was no point creating this sub-forum.

 

As long as its still on the forum .... its not a big deal IMO

 

Exactly.

 

I have to respectfully disagree - while it does take some effort on the more advanced pics, anyone that can adjust brightness & contrast can do the basic X-ray techniques with decent results on a good pic to reveal more than the original pic does, and I am glad to see most of the people posting lately aren't doing much more than that.

 

I've tried x-raying and couldn't do it so i think there is a degree of creative skill involved.

Take signature making. If i make a really basic crop with a border and name for a signature all it takes is an eye for a good image. But if you take TCF, Silent B or toolz (amongst many others) they take signature making to another level.
If they want to make something they have to be able to sit down, figure out what they are going to do and how to go about doing it and then use their techincal knowledge to carry it out. This is the same principal behind x-raying.

Now, if you take away all creaticity the process is lost. If you have a particularly difficult image that you have spent time x-raying then you have to rely on mental creativiy to reach that end result.

 

Avril Lavigne (its a bit rough the original wasn't up to much, maybe someone else could have a go?)

 

looks better in blue! good work!

 

Mandy Moore

 

Michelle Pfeiffer




found in the '***0ops, Exposed, Nude, C-throu, Upskirt, Accidential & more' Thread

http://forum.phun.org/showthread.php?t=76424&page=284

 

Julia Stiles - O Premiere



yum

 

is she that india chick the actress of all those Bollywood flicks?

 

Yeah frickin right!!!

 

Would love to see that without as much colouring added, so its possible to see the natural tones underneath. Could be a great pic.

Not a criticism, some people like to colourise, some don't.

 

Thought I'd have a quick go at these.