UNPUBLISHED Britney Spears- GQ Magazine Outtakes from 2003

What?

 

He said:

I posted these, and ~9 other threads with similar content with other actresses a couple days ago (including unexpected stuff, like Alicia Silverstone in her prime with visible nipples), and they all got deleted. Meh.

 

Ok just wowe knew who the other celebs were

 

The Pix were taken before here two pregnancies.
Her both sons were born 2005 and 2006 and here boobs seems to remain much bigger than before the pregnancies.

ps i hope my english is not too bad to understand what i mean.

 

Just click the pic to super-size it. You can count freckles
Great Post! @ChrundleTheGreat !

Brother!

 

Thanks for Britney!

 

Outstanding! Thanks for sharing.

 

I don’t have access to what came from where/when, or what goes together... so that pretty much just means I can’t post them. If you think that’s better for Phun, so be it.

 

Bombs away

 

There is other places you can post.

 

You didn't have access. Really? All those photos (except for the ones of Britney and Carrie-Anne Moss) have the GettyImages tag... At Getty you can find out when/where they came from.

 

Even if you didnt get them from Getty, as yucon pointed out, you had access if you wanted to do some research. You just didnt have the information on hand because you probably snatched them all off some other shit site with no standards. All the rules are for a reason. They arent arbitrary. Almost 17 years, 400,000+ members, near 2 million indiviual threads as well as the general look and atmosphere of the place comes from years of tweaking and seeing what works and what doesnt. This site is one of the most comprehensive boards of this nature and has stood the test of time in spite of the chan and reddit sites and social media. So, yes, the facts, and the moderation crew, both current and past, think its better for phun.

 

Of the ones I had posted, several were from Getty, yes. I only got ~20% done when I realized the threads weren’t actually being seen and gave up.

... and the Alicia Silverstone thread was ~20 pics IIRC, all high res and showing more than I’ve ever seen from her elsewhere .

I’ve been gathering them for a couple years, and didn’t record as I went through them the date/time/source of each picture.

I feel like people would enjoy the stuff I posted— Carrie fisher (admitted post her prime), Courtney Cox, Alicia Silverstone, etc... all high res... have all been sought after for a while.

Anyway, message received— I’ll give up on posting them or mentioning this further. No skin off my back— I have them either way.

 

Power tripping mods and internet forums go hand in hand. Old news. They probably just want to re-post your stuff themselves.

 

If youre making a list of things that go hand in hand with internet forums, you have to include dime a dozen users who have absolutely nothing remarkable or noteworthy about them making clever snide remarks whenever possible. In your version of phun, you wouldnt even get to say what you did or get an actual response from a mod. I dont think this place speaks to your interpretation at all. But you dont care about facts or reality, youre just looking for visibility to try to set yourself apart from all the other dime a dozens.

 

They are obviously not re-posting stuff for themselves here, so that is unfair!
While people can arguing about the forum's hard delete style and quickness to close threads, you cannot argue with the success.
That means for most users there is far more right than wrong occurring on here so just enjoy getting free content.
If the rules don't fit what you would do on a forum, so be it.
It is not that important and if it seems to be - it shouldn't be!

 

I'm probably not getting involved with this any more than what i post below.

He told me in 2019 that he had a bunch of copyrighted tags photos and asked if it was ok to post. I told him it was ok but posting tagged pics is frowned upon and you'd have to put tags in the title. Obviously I thought the main thread rules would be followed also.

On sunday he made a bunch of threads with titles like
"New, pre motherhood, Britney Spears nip slips"
"Alicia Silverstone see through to nipple, in her prime"
"Neve Campbell see through from before we knew..."
so of course they were deleted.

He then messaged me and asked why. I wasn't around at the time so I looked at the titles of a few of them and went in one thread. I then messaged him back the name of the mod who deleted them and said "You can ask him the specifics of why but right off the bat I see you didnt make correct titles."

He messaged me back and said apparently it was about the image host and asked if thats what I used and I told him yeah but most use imagebam cause it's easier.

I was messaged again and was asked if the host wast the issue they were deleted and that he used the host I use cause he assumed it was fine. I replied "I think it was the title plus that the images were all posted on top of each other which made the thread super long."

Then this thread came along posted by someone else (NOT A MOD) He messaged me last night and said suspiciously the same four Britney pics were posted with a link to this thread. I told him I didnt know what was going on but I had to get ready for work and would look into it in the morning. While at work I guess shit hit the fan cause he came in here mentioning he posted these already along with other content that had been deleted. Now that I have read all this, looked at all his other deleted threads I understand and agree with why they all were deleted. Not sure why he didnt just read the rules or listen when I said it was about the titles. Didn't even put tags in the title which I told him HE HAD TO DO a year ago. Now this thread has been derailed and nobody is talking about Britney. YAY!!!! I probably come off like a dick here but I'm fucking tired and reading all this was annoying when it all could of been handled behind the scenes since I told him I'd look into it in the morning.

 

You did not come across like a dick at all.
The fact that you had private dialogue with him before he posted publicly about his frustrations is proof of that.
His post made it seem different than your post.

Now lets realize all this is about see-through photos and chuckle.