DEBATE Emma Watson - topless pic LQ - 8/4/20 **Discussion Thread, click at your own risk**

The debate is already over lol. Look at any HQ photo of Emma’s face from the last few years... she has a tiny but very distinct little bump on her chin. Sometimes it’s hard to see unless the photo is at a good angle, but it’s there. And the woman in the bath video has the very same little bump in the exact same spot on her chin, which is featured prominently in the video (believe me I’ve spent a lot time watching it lol). So it is beyond question that the person in the bath is Emma. I certainly didn’t notice this at all in many early watches so it is definitely easy to miss, especially when you are paying more attention to other parts that are not her chin

Surprised this hasn’t been noticed and pointed out by anyone here. You guys are usually such solid detectives! I didn’t realize people were even still questioning it tbh. I’ve been a long time follower but I signed up just to make this post and hopefully make some of you very happy.

This takes nothing away from the pap shots though as they finally add her full face into the picture

 

This was either shot by someone else to the other shots due to the vastly different perspective or the same guy from the others who could get away with a good proper camera from on high had to shoot with a phone if he came down to get these shots maybe because they put the parasols up and he could no longer see.

Well the magazine must be convinced anyhow.

 

Hm - I'm happy to see them but, it's just some regular titties.

I don't know what I was expecting. You kind of knew the hype wouldn't live up to it.

 

CORRECT! Five points to Gryffindor. Your spell worked. Apparently (or apparately or dis-apparel-ly).

Public mag guessed Hermione herself incanted "Wingardia Bikinia". Other guys came up with similar. Me, I was leaning toward simpler spells like "Leviosa!" & "Expelliarmus!" Wha'evva. As a brit dude might say, "Result!" Anyway, maybe a bit of a blunt sentiment, but all's well that ends like this did.

 

You're only speaking for yourself. As I'm sure you know. As am I. We knew exactly what to expect. Because we looked at the evidence our detectives dug up with an open mind. Didn't go straight to the smartass cynical take & ignorantly cry FAKE. No, we saw that the case in favor of the obvious positive conclusion was solid. Backed up by detail after detail. Therefore we rationally looked at the L3k3 pix as legit depictions of those regular titties. Gee, turns out they look remarkably the same. As Condi Rice said after 9/11, "No one could have anticipated that."

While I agree that there are millions & millions of muggle women with looks as good or better, none of those others starred in Harry Potter, Beauty & The Beast, The Circle, or Little Women. Among all those we irrationally elevate for no other reason than we saw them on TV or in films, Emma Watson is one of the prettiest of them all. Now, that's not an absolute, it's subjective. But I happen not to agree with dudes I see as the outliers. Who see, for example, Winstead as plain & Kristen Stewart as 'looks like a boy'. FWIW, I ignore the hype. Just like you. I just independently reached the conclusion that this particular moment in history is EPIC. Even if no more pix drop.

If you scour the web a bit, you'll find dozens of pix of this outing that have been posted. Around 100, actually. From different angles. There's nothing fishy here. Everything adds up. The way the hair is tied up in a bun. The hoop earrings. The bright yellow frilly bottoms. The only thing missing that we saw in the asscrack shots is that barely there black tank top is off. Never mind that I consider myself pretty good with faces & this face looks like Emma Watson to me. Please be my guest & feel free to disregard that.

You're mistaken. I mean, what's your evidence this was taken inside? It looks exactly like a bunch of the clearly outdoors pics I've seen. Maybe a bit zoomed-in & cropped, so you aren't seeing the surroundings. But same white towel, same orange cushion, bright sunlight glinting off unshaded areas of her alabaster chest.

Once again, people going for the free points from calling doubt without a rationale that can stand up to back it up. Why can't you simply back the heck off & let everyone else have their fun? Really, it costs you nothing.

 

Probably, yeah. Also, artifacting. I doubt the pic was taken from particularly closeup. Zoomed/cropped. Bright white decor from behind reflecting bright sunlight off her cheek. Neck/shoulder in shadow. Result, blur/pixellation. Really, there's no clear conclusion based on this stretch of the evidence. I can't prove there's been no manipulation. I'm open to the idea. I'm willing to look carefully. I like to think I'm skeptical. But so far, I've yet to find myself drowning in doubt.

 

Let it go.

 

IOW sometimes it's indistinct. What it is, is distinctive. Distinct = easy to see. Distinctive = unique. Or at least rare. Her chin bump/blemish/birthmark/persistent freckle/whatever it is, pins down her identity pretty well. It seems to me. So, I'm agreeing with you.

 

Yes, it's outdoors but it's a private hotel with a private beach surrended by cliffs... So, the paparazzi was "outside" the resort, probably hanging on a tree.

But the topless pic was taken from a frontal view, meaning that it was taken by someone "inside" the resort.
"Same" towel, cushion and sunlight, but it wasn't at the area. How do I know that? Because there are some flowers. Do you see any flower in the other pics? No, right? But there are flowers around the pool area.


I don't know why I waste my time... and now I feel like a freaking stalker

And stop using this thread to discuss about the leaks.

 

Not trying to restart any arguments but hadn't a chance to make a point and don't show this has been mentioned. The argument about the pic being fake because of the strap line on her shoulder. There is a quick way to prove that they didn't need to fake this. Look at the pics from the next day when she is wearing the strapless pink bikini. You can see the same tan lines on her shoulders from the straps.

 

If you guys don't stop bickering I'm gonna Avada Kedavra myself.

 

Wow that place looks amazing

 

You're going to point at ME for REPLY'ing to other comments? Sure thing. That seems fair.

I don't feel you're wasting your time. What does trying to determine the authenticity of a pic have to with stalking?

You made good points. Your pictures add context. The pool area in your 2nd pic isn't visible from your 1st pic. But it might be off to the left. Or the right ("around the corner"). I can't tell how unapproachable the pool area might be, either from outside what looks like a low wall facing the water, or from above/behind or from the side. In many of the pics, we can see outside stairs all the way down to the water. Would it be possible for a non-guest to sneak up & not get caught? I can't tell.

Maybe the pic-taker was someone she thought she could trust. Maybe she posed for it. I don't know nor do I hazard a guess. Of the 6 dozen or more pics I saw, many that appear to be of this pool area seem to have been taken from a particular direction. I don't know how hard it would've been to get to the angle the topless pic was taken from. But I'm not seeing how you've definitely ruled it out. There are flowers in every direction. We don't have a 3D bead on distance along the line of sight. The lounge chairs, tables & umbrellas are all portable. I can't even tell for sure if the ground underneath is stone in all the pics. In many it looks like sand. But where's the beach?

I get that you think the pic-taker was inside the resort. I don't know what your "the area" refers to. OK, the furniture & linens share the theme seen elsewhere on the grounds of the resort. Surely that suggests the pool is in the resort somewhere. So what was "wasn't at the area" supposed to mean? The towel & cushion may or may not be identical to the topless pic. But the theme is at least similar.

That doesn't look like a frontal view. Sure, she turned to one side to face the camera. It looks like from the side, only a few feet less behind the head of the lounge chair, as compared to the rest (the non-topless ones). Also the camera angle seems to be close to the height of the cushions. Like the photog is squatting. Her grin & aiming her own camera back, suggests she knows the pic is being taken. But her reaction shows no shock or dismay.

 

It looks like the topless one was taken from a boat.

 

Yep. Seems like that could well explain it. (Quality optics.)

 

Nudography is listing is as real. Still waiting for more pics, though. What do you suppose a magazine has to pay for a single pic like that?

 

Don't see the point. Getting your tits out is not something to deny and be ashamed of lol

 

The pool is at the top of the cliff, so people can forget about the boat theory.

Now, I take it back, it wasn't from inside... Found some other pics, as you can see the neighbors have a nice view of the pool.


This is getting silly (I'm about to close the thread) don't overthink it. Someone took a pic, sold it, period.

 

Damn... An old school paparazzi topless shot of an actual celebrity and it's Emma Watson:drooling:

You'll be surprised how quick you get used to that feeling.

 

Downloaded a Pdf of the magazine and, unfortunately, these are the only pics of Emma in it

Edit: https://www49.zippyshare.com/v/Ottm4z7S/file.html